Information, apply to, and candidate sex inside the You

Information, apply to, and candidate sex inside the You

101 . Newhagen , John Elizabeth. , “Beyond worry about-report: Playing with latency to resolve design issue responding processes on web-based public-opinion surveys,” from the Sourcebook for Governmental Communications Lookup , eds. Bucy , Erik P. and you may Lance Holbert , R. ( Ny : Routledge , 2011 ).Yahoo College student

102 . Oxley , Douglas Roentgen. , Smith , Kevin B. , Alford , John Roentgen. , Hibbing , Matthew V. , Miller , Jennifer L. , Scalora , Mario , Hatemi , Peter K. , and you will Hibbing , John Roentgen. , “Political thinking vary that have emotional characteristics,” Technology , 321 : 1667 – 1670 .CrossRefGoogle Student

103 . hot women that are single Swers , Michele L. , “Is female more likely to choose to possess women’s items expense than simply their male associates?” Legislative Education Every quarter 1998 , 23 : 435 – 448 .CrossRefGoogle Student

104 . Swers , Michele L. , The real difference Feminine Create: The policy Feeling of females for the Congress ( il : College out-of il Force , 2002 ).Google Student

105 . Slope , Kim Quaile and you will Hurley , Patricia An excellent. , “A symbol speeches in the U.S. Senate in addition to their representational effects,” Log from Government 2002 , 64 : 219 – 231 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

108 . Mansbridge , Jane , “Is to blacks portray blacks and you will women represent women? An excellent contingent ‘yes’,” Record out-of Government 1999 , 61 ( step three ): 627 – 657 .CrossRefGoogle Student

109 . Sanbonmatsu , Kira , “Gender-related political knowledge and also the descriptive sign of females,” Governmental Decisions 2003 , 25 : 367 – 388 .CrossRefGoogle Beginner

110 . Dolan , Kathleen , “Can there be an effective ‘gender attraction effect’ from inside the American government? S. Household elections,” Governmental Browse Every quarter 2008 , 61 : 79 – 89 .CrossRefGoogle Beginner

This information might have been cited because of the following books. This list is made predicated on studies available with Crossref.

Benstead, Lindsay J. Jamal, Amaney A good. and Crave, Ellen 2015. Could it be Gender, Religiosity otherwise Each other? A job Congruity Principle away from Applicant Electability inside Transformation Tunisia. Perspectives with the Politics, Vol. thirteen, Issue. 1, p. 74.

Bauer, Nichole Yards. 2015. Which stereotypes women applicants? Pinpointing personal differences in women stereotype dependency. Politics, Communities, and you will Identities, Vol. 3, Situation. step one, p. 94.

Rosenthal , Cindy Simon , “New part out of gender inside the detailed representation,” Political Research Quarterly 1995 , forty eight : 599 – 611

McLaughlin, Bryan Davis, Catasha Coppini, David Kim, More youthful Mie Knisely, Sandra and you may McLeod, Douglas 2015. When women assault. Politics additionally the Existence Sciences, Vol. 34, Thing. 1, p. 49.

Pyeatt, Nicholas L. and Yanus, Alixandra B. 2016. Sending blended indicators: the latest part out of gender and you may partisanship inside recommendations of political leaders. Log regarding Elections, Public opinion and you will Parties, Vol. twenty six, Point. 4, p. 423.

Koch, Thomas and Obermaier, Magdalena 2016. With Cardiovascular system and you can (No) Brain? Exactly how Recipients Adversely Infer Missing Information about People in politics as well as how Which Affects the Review of your own Speakermunication Look, Vol. 43, Procedure. eight, p. 972.

Turska-Kawa, Agnieszka and you can Olszanecka-. Stereotypes Deciding Attitudes out-of Feminine Political leaders: Your situation from Poland. Politics in the Main Europe, Vol. 14, Issue. step three, p. seven.

Schneider, Monica C. and you will Bos, Angela L. 2019. The usage of Social Part Idea with the Examination of Gender in the Politics. Governmental Therapy, Vol. 40, Matter. S1, p. 173.

Park, Sunrays More youthful and you will Baek, More youthful Min 2019. Citizens’ Ambivalence on Feminine People in politics: As to the reasons Ambivalence Issues to have Gender Equivalence during the good Democracy. Log of females, Politics & Plan, Vol. forty, Question. 2, p. 309.

Rusidze, Nino 2019. Stereotypes, Character Assassination and you can Women in Government. Corvinus Record out of Internationally Products, Vol. 4, Thing. step 1, p. fifteen.

Aaldering, Loes and you can Van Der Jamais, Daphne Joanna 2020. Governmental Leadership about Mass media: Gender Bias in Chief Stereotypes while in the Venture and Regimen Times. United kingdom Diary of Political Research, Vol. 50, Question. step 3, p. 911.

Boer, Noortje 2020. How can Residents Evaluate Roadway?Level Bureaucrats’ Love and you can Proficiency? An effective Typology and Decide to try. Societal Management Feedback, Vol. 80, Procedure. 4, p. 532.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *