Advice, connect with, and you may candidate sex inside U

Advice, connect with, and you may candidate sex inside U

101 . Newhagen , John Age. , “Past worry about-report: Using latency to resolve design practical question reacting techniques toward web-oriented public opinion surveys,” in the Sourcebook to have Political Communication Lookup , eds. Bucy , Erik P. and Lance Holbert , R. ( Nyc : Routledge , 2011 ).Yahoo Beginner

102 . Oxley , Douglas R. , Smith , Kevin B. , Alford , John R. , Hibbing , Matthew V. , Miller , Jennifer L. , Scalora , Mario , Hatemi , Peter K. , and Hibbing , John R. , “Political attitudes are different which have physiological characteristics,” Science , 321 : 1667 – 1670 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

103 . Swers , Michele L. , “Try women expected to vote to own ladies’ affairs expenses than the male associates?” Legislative Training Every quarter 1998 , 23 : 435 – 448 .CrossRefGoogle Beginner

104 . Swers , Michele L. , The real difference Feminine Generate: The policy Impact of females when you look at the Congress ( il : School away from il Force , 2002 ).Google Pupil

105 . Slope , Kim Quaile and Hurley , Patricia A good. , “A symbol speeches on You.S. Senate and their representational implications,” Diary from Politics 2002 , 64 : 219 – 231 .CrossRefGoogle Beginner

108 . Mansbridge , Jane , “Is always to blacks portray blacks and you will female depict women? Good contingent ‘yes’,” Diary off Government 1999 , 61 ( step 3 ): 627 – 657 .CrossRefGoogle Student

109 . Sanbonmatsu , Kira , “Gender-associated governmental knowledge and also the descriptive sign of females,” Governmental Conclusion 2003 , twenty-five : 367 – 388 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

110 . Dolan , Kathleen , “Could there be a beneficial ‘gender affinity effect’ in American government? S. Family elections,” Political Look Quarterly 2008 , 61 : 79 – 89 .CrossRefGoogle College student

This information has been quoted because of the pursuing the books. So it record is established considering studies available with Crossref.

Benstead, Lindsay J. Jamal, Amaney Good. and you can Lust, Ellen 2015. Is it Gender, Religiosity otherwise Both? A job Congruity Idea away from Applicant Electability in Transitional Tunisia. Perspectives with the Politics which israeli women are most beautiful, Vol. thirteen, Situation. step 1, p. 74.

Bauer, Nichole Yards. 2015. Which stereotypes female individuals? Identifying private variations in female label dependency. Government, Teams, and you can Identities, Vol. 3, Topic. 1, p. 94.

Rosenthal , Cindy Simon , “The fresh new character off gender into the descriptive image,” Governmental Lookup Every quarter 1995 , forty eight : 599 – 611

McLaughlin, Bryan Davis, Catasha Coppini, David Kim, Younger Mie Knisely, Sandra and McLeod, Douglas 2015. When female assault. Government plus the Existence Sciences, Vol. 34, Situation. 1, p. forty-two.

Pyeatt, Nicholas L. and Yanus, Alixandra B. 2016. Giving blended signals: the part regarding gender and partisanship in ratings regarding political leaders. Diary from Elections, Public opinion and you can Activities, Vol. twenty-six, Question. 4, p. 423.

Koch, Thomas and Obermaier, Magdalena 2016. With Heart and you will (No) Attention? Exactly how Readers Negatively Infer Forgotten Information regarding Political figures and just how It Affects the latest Investigations of one’s Speakermunication Look, Vol. 43, Question. 7, p. 972.

Turska-Kawa, Agnieszka and you can Olszanecka-. Stereotypes Determining Perceptions regarding Feminine Political figures: The scenario out of Poland. Government during the Central European countries, Vol. 14, Matter. step 3, p. 7.

Schneider, Monica C. and Bos, Angela L. 2019. Employing Societal Part Theory to your Study of Gender inside the Government. Political Therapy, Vol. 40, Situation. S1, p. 173.

Playground, Sunrays Younger and you will Baek, More youthful Minute 2019. Citizens’ Ambivalence towards Women Political leaders: As to why Ambivalence Matters to have Gender Equivalence into the an effective Democracy. Record of women, Politics & Policy, Vol. forty, Topic. 2, p. 309.

Rusidze, Nino 2019. Stereotypes, Character Assassination and you may Ladies in Government. Corvinus Record of Global Activities, Vol. 4, Situation. step one, p. 15.

Aaldering, Loes and you may Van Der Pas, Daphne Joanna 2020. Political Leaders from the News: Gender Bias in Frontrunner Stereotypes during the Venture and you will Program Minutes. Uk Log from Governmental Science, Vol. fifty, Procedure. step three, p. 911.

Boer, Noortje 2020. How do Owners Evaluate Roadway?Top Bureaucrats’ Enthusiasm and you can Proficiency? A Typology and you may Attempt. Public Administration Review, Vol. 80, Material. cuatro, p. 532.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *